What to say when: Guidelines for Decision Making An evaluation of a concept for cooperation in an APOC
نویسندگان
چکیده
Because airports are currently a bottleneck in the ATM system research and development effort is spent in creating high performing airport operations. In order to actively influence airport performance, joint decisions made in an Airport Operations Control Center (APOC) are proposed. This idea raises several research questions; one is in how far guidelines for a structured communication process mitigate factors like conflicts and personality which might prevent an effective and efficient decision making in the APOC. This paper explores the impact of a concept for cooperation for airport stakeholders in a planning task. Four teams with four airport experts took part in a high-fidelity study. The guidelines significantly improved experienced team effectiveness. Results show that guidelines lead to a more pro-active, information driven decision making and mitigate some effects of individual interaction behavior. CDM; Collaborative Decision Making; Cooperation; Airport Operations; Human Factors
منابع مشابه
Using the Taxonomy and the Metrics: What to Study When and Why; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”
Dukhanin and colleagues’ taxonomy of metrics for patient engagement at the organizational and system levels has great potential for supporting more careful and useful evaluations of this ever-growing phenomenon. This commentary highlights the central importance to the taxonomy of metrics assessing the extent of meaningful participation in decision-making by patients, consumers and community mem...
متن کاملPROVIDING A MODEL FOR THE SUPPLIER SELECTION PROCESS IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT WITH HYBRID MODEL OF DECISION MAKING
<span style="color: #000000; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: -webkit-left; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none; ba...
متن کاملMetacognition and Decision Making in Management Accounting Students
Competitive and skilled management accountants are needed for the companies' survival in an ever-changing world and also a world without borders. Therefore, the problem is what components in a decision maker brings out the best decision. Since learning is continuous and continuous learning is essential in an ever changing world in order for the company to survive. The aim of this study is to de...
متن کاملUse of Cost-Effectiveness Data in Priority Setting Decisions: Experiences from the National Guidelines for Heart Diseases in Sweden
Background The inclusion of cost-effectiveness data, as a basis for priority setting rankings, is a distinguishing feature in the formulation of the Swedish national guidelines. Guidelines are generated with the direct intent to influence health policy and support decisions about the efficient allocation of scarce healthcare resources. Certain medical conditions may be given higher priority ran...
متن کاملEvidence for Informing Health Policy Development in Low- Income Countries (LICS): Perspectives of Policy Actors in Uganda
Background Although there is a general agreement on the benefits of evidence informed health policy development given resource constraints especially in Low-Income Countries (LICs), the definition of what evidence is, and what evidence is suitable to guide decision-making is still unclear. Our study is contributing to filling this knowledge gap. We aimed to explore health policy actors’ views r...
متن کامل